Pirates on the Prowl in the Offshore

Opportunists lurk in today's offshore oil and gas industry. And like the buccaneers of old, they are starting to make waves.

Last week, Luminus Management issued a press release criticizing the management and board of Valaris. Luminus, through its affiliates, owns 18.7% of Valaris. The firm is the company's largest shareholder.

Luminus says it will call a meeting of shareholders to consider the firm's handpicked “upgrades” to the board. Once in place, the new board members are expected to push one or more Luminus proposals to return capital to shareholders.

Luminus has decidedly raised the black flag. The firm blames Valaris's leadership for a “litany of failures” and an “astounding number of mistakes.” This, it claims, has led to “unfathomable” and “horrific” performance for shareholders. It's grim stuff.

But the attacks belie the facts. Valaris's legacy companies have dominated the customer satisfaction rankings over the years. Lest this matter not to the firm's luminaries, we'd point them to evidence of customer satisfaction's tie to investor returns in the oilfield. Satisfied customers are one of Valaris's most valuable assets.

Luminus has also done some cherry-picking. To wit, the comparison of Valaris's stock-price performance to that of Noble Corp, Diamond Offshore and Transocean is incomplete. A full comparison should also include Seadrill and Pacific Drilling—both of which filed for bankruptcy.

Stock price returns of offshore drillers over time.

The troubles don't end there. Hercules Offshore, Vantage Drilling, Paragon Offshore, Ocean Rig  and Parker Drilling have also visited bankruptcy. Luminus itself suggests Atwood Oceanics, prior to its purchase by Ensco, was courting insolvency.

It is true that Valaris's stock is down 80.4% over the last year and down 97.3% over ten years. But a slew of other offshore drillers have lost it all for investors during the downturn. Even Luminus's favored comparables are down 95% over the last decade.

According to Valaris, Luminus has proposed returns-of-capital to shareholders ranging from $500 million to $2.5 billion—all funded by debt and cost reductions. Based on the estimated impacts of the proposals on Valaris's balance sheet, it's hard to see where the romance lies.

Leverage ratios for Valaris under various scenarios.

By our calculations, Valaris's total net debt-to-capital currently current sits at 36.2 %. The peer-group average is 40.1%. Luminus's most aggressive proposal would push the level past 50%. This is higher than for any of Luminus's selected comparables. The least-aggressive proposal increases leverage by ~300 basis points.

It's hard to see the rational in raising Valaris's leverage above peer-group levels when most of the industry is eschewing debt althogether. What's more, for a company that has incurred almost $500 million in negative cash flow in 2019, additional leverage seems irresponsible.

It's not clear if any of Luminus's proposals are even viable. More than one Wall Street bank projects the price of West Texas Intermediate to fall below $50 in 2020. Finding lenders that won't demand moratoriums on dividends and buybacks in such a market seems unlikely.

To sidestep this hurdle, Luminous reportedly proposes it take on the role of lender. While its willingness to assume risks that others won't might get a deal done, it's far from a selling point.

None of this is to say leveraged recaps don't have their place. They can represent legitimate pursuit of value. But there's a time and place, and this isn't it. History suggests aggressive capital structures in the offshore can bring more problems than they are worth.

Transocean's merger with Global Santa Fe over a decade ago is a case in point. As part of the transaction, the combined company took on $15 billion in new debt to fund a special dividend to shareholders of the same amount. To facilitate the deal, the companies' respective advisors—Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers—provided the financing.

Pointing to the combined company's significant backlog, the Wall Street Svengalis expressed confidence in the deal's efficacy. The capital structure was touted as allowing room for growth and investment even as debt service antithetically consumed the first two years of operational cash flow.

What happened next is a warning for the ages.

Previously one of the top-rated offshore drillers in customer satisfaction, Transocean's scores began to decline as cost cuts stretched the organization. Investments in people and assets were reined in as debt service took priority.

Then, on April 20, 2010, the unthinkable happened. Transocean's Deepwater Horizon rig caught fire in the Gulf of Mexico, capsized and eventually sank to the ocean floor. Eleven people died in the incident. Millions of barrels of oil were spilled, and an environmental disaster ensued.

For its role, Transocean was forced to pay $1.4 billion in fines. It also admitted that its personnel were partly responsible for the incident. But the company paid an even greater price in terms of reputation.

In the years since, Transocean has worked hard at changing its ways. Safety is still paramount, but so is financial stability. Today, the company's net debt-to-capital is actually below that of Valaris.

The point? The oil and gas industry doesn't need to repeat the mistakes of the past. While playing the long game doesn't ensure Valaris outperforms, it does allow the company to focus on its strengths—safe and efficient operations underpinned by world-class assets, ample liquidity, and a strong bond with customers.

For the foreseeable future, surviving in the offshore is winning. If the price for survival is short-term investors jumping ship, so be it. There's too much at stake for drillers to be courting gratuitous risks, especially when such rolls of the dice so often seem come up snake eyes.

Best to leave some things to the pros.

New service from OilVoice
Trip Shepherd is for companies who need to track their staff in areas of risk.
It's free to use, so we invite you to try it.

Visit source site


valarisENSCORowanRowan CompaniesNoble CorporationDiamond OffshoreTransoceanSeadrillDeepwater HorizonOffshore Drilling

More items from dougsheridan

Newpark Resources & Core Lab Top EnergyPoint's 2020 Oilfield Services Customer Satisfaction Rankings

HOUSTON (August 12, 2020) – EnergyPoint Research announces results from its 2020 Oilfield Services Customer Satisfaction Survey. Newpark Resources , an independent provider of drilling fluids services and systems received the top rating in this year's survey. In addition to ranking first overall, ...

Doug Sheridan - EnergyPoint Research

Posted 3 months agoPress > customer satisfactionnewpark resources

Can Oilfield Suppliers Save Themselves?

Few sectors have ever fallen farther over any extended period than oilfield suppliers have since the beginning of the current industry downturn in  June 2014 . Relative to the broader market, the sector's decline may be totally unprecedented. Six years ago, Saudi Arabia fired the round felt around ...

Doug Sheridan - EnergyPoint Research

Posted 4 months agoOpinion > WeatherfordSchlumbergerHalliburton +4

Apergy, Derrick Equipment, Newpark Resources, Gardner Denver and Dril-Quip Top 2020 Oilfield Products Ratings

HOUSTON (January 22, 2020) – EnergyPoint Research announces final results from its 2020 Oilfield Products Customer Satisfaction Survey. The survey, which has been conducted annually since 2007, is one of several EnergyPoint studies focused on the oil and gas industry's satisfaction with the product ...

Doug Sheridan - EnergyPoint Research

Posted 10 months agoPress > ApergyDerrick Equipmentnewpark resources +7

Rule of Thirds: Breaking It Down in the Midstream

Shrinking E&P budgets, weak commodity prices, the rise of environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing. The case for greater emphasis on customer satisfaction in the oil and gas industry has never been stronger. Providers of midstream services, and their stakeholders, ignore the evidence at ...

Doug Sheridan - EnergyPoint Research

Posted 11 months agoOpinion > midstreamOil Gathering LinesMarkWest Energy Partners +4


Infrastructure & Services Needed to Facilitate Continued Oil and Gas Development and Growing Exports Place Midstream Providers in Spotlight HOUSTON (November 5, 2019) – EnergyPoint Research, the leading provider of customer satisfaction ratings for the oil and gas industry, announces results from ...

Doug Sheridan - EnergyPoint Research

Posted 1 year agoPress > oil and gas midstreamSurveyMPLX +10
All posts from dougsheridan