Opinion

Trump Flips Oil Prices




Last week, the US launched 59 Tomahawk missiles against the Syrian government in response to chemical gas attacks on its own the civilian population there. Then later in the week, the US announced that it has dropped the GBU-43/B Massive Ordinance Air Blast (MOAB) bomb – better known as the Mother of All Bombs – for the first time in Afghanistan, targeting an underground network of ISIS insurgents. More worryingly, the Trump administration has opened the possibility it may launch a first strike against North Korea.  US warships are already gathering around South Korea, joined by some Japanese battleships as well, while on the other sides, reports have come in that China is amassing as many as 150,000 troops along its North Korean border.

Crude oil promptly rose on the news about the Syrian missile attack. Considering that from the last 3 years of on-going conflict in Libya, northern Iraq and Yemen in which the market completely ignored any substantial risk to oil supply, the events last week seems to be taking a different perspective. The market appears to be considering real geopolitical risk arising from the new conflicts at play now. Regardless if nothing comes out of it in the ends.

Concerns are growing about the possible reversal of the Iranian nuclear agreement, which may result in a cut of Iranian supply. Where there was optimism of US – Russian relations is now looking the other way. The prospect that Donald Trump will remove trade sanctions on Russia is now looking more remote than ever. But more worrying is the situation in North Korea. A first strike on the part of the US could trigger a disproportionate retaliation by the belligerent nation, with South Korea caught in the crossfire. An important hub for oil and gas refining and trade in the region, most of South Korea' important oil and gas facilities are in the safer southernmost part of the peninsula, but capital Seoul is less than 60km from the North Korea border. If North Korea has a nuclear-capable weapon, as is widely suspected, carnage could be unleashed, engulfing not just the Korean Peninsula, but Japan and China as well.

The issue of geopolitical risk can also be linked to the unpredictable nature of the current White House and Mar-a-Lago (depending on the day of the week). It has been a week of unprecedented flip and flops in relation to several core election promises.  Trump's more extreme campaign promises abated this week, to the chagrin of some of his more right-wing supporters. He failed to label China as a ‘currency manipulator' during his meeting with Chinese premier Xi Jinping, which would have likely started a disruptive tit-for-tat trade war. He walked back on his claims that NATO, saying the organisation was no longer ‘obsolete'.  Oil traders are wary that Trump may not have consistent policy viewpoint on how far he will go with the growing conflicts. His promise to not divulge military plans as a measure to keep his enemies guessing, may just keep the markets guessing as well, creating uncertainly.

The issue about geopolitical risks, also comes at a time when the market appears to be tightening up. OPEC is predicted to proceed with the cuts in May, allowing for further excess stock depletion. This could put the market into recovery mode in the next half of the year. Any unexpected or perceived shocks to supply from wars or sanctions may drive prices up further.


Visit source site

https://nrgedge.net/article/1492437847-trump-flips...

More items from easwaran


France’s Symbolic Ban on Oil

The government of Emmanuel Macron was elected on a long-string of promises. One of which was to make France carbon neutral by 2050, which would entail weaning the country off the usage of hydrocarbons. It is a trend that has been replicated across Europe, but Macron wants to go even further. Legisla ...

Easwaran Kanason


Posted 13 days agoOpinion

Houston Is Down But Not Out

The aftermath of Hurricane Harvey has left devastation in its wake. It dumped some 27 trillion gallons of water on the states of Texas and Louisiana, causing an estimated US$75 billion in damages.  From the energy perspective, there were worries that coastal refining centres would be swamped, taking ...

Easwaran Kanason


Posted 18 days agoOpinion

The Phenomenon of Independent ‘Teapot’ Refiners in China

After a rise, must come a fall. Chinese refinery runs in June 2017 reached the second highest level on record, jumping to 11.21 mmbpd, up from 10.98 mmbpd in May 2017 and up 2.3% y-o-y. Two of the highest monthly output statistics have occurred in the last nine months, the absolute highest being 11. ...

Easwaran Kanason


Posted 1 month agoOpinion

The Permian Basin Phenomenon Is Far From Over

Much has been made of the recent confidence tumble in America's Permian Basin, the low cost and prodigious shale play that straddles Texas and New Mexico. It began when Pioneer Natural Resources announced its second-quarter financial results – reporting net income of US$233 million, compared to a ne ...

Easwaran Kanason


Posted 1 month agoOpinion

Pacific Northwest LNG just needed a “re-think”

In retrospect, it will be seen as a good decision. Petronas is pulling out of the US$29 billion Pacific Northwest LNG project in British Columbia, Canada. The Malaysian state oil company cited ‘prolonged depressed prices and shifts in the energy industry' as the reasons for exiting the long-gestatin ...

Easwaran Kanason


Posted 1 month agoOpinion
All posts from easwaran