How to Manage Risk and Uncertainty in Mature Fields?

AGRs Principal Reservoir Engineer and Trainer, Mark Cook, discusses effective risk and uncertainty management methods.

Mark Cook is one of the trainers and developers behind the AGRs Business and Risk training series. In addition to having delivered reservoir engineering consultancy to many of the global oil and gas companies, Mark teaches actively Petroleum Engineering Masters students at the University of Aberdeen and is the author of "Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production" handbook.

In May 2015 during a conference, Mark presented a Masterclass seminar on Managing Uncertainty and Risk in Mature Fields. Here's the summary of this presentation:

The quantification of risk and uncertainty is often discussed in the context of exploration and appraisal, yet most of the upstream E&P business concerns decision-making in producing assets.

In the context of many mature hydrocarbon areas, this translates into decision-making in mature fields.

Uncertainty-handling in development and production

Uncertainty-handling in development and production differs from that in E&A, as it must deal with a growing and often imperfect production database against a backdrop of constantly changing circumstances. As the life cycle progresses, initial uncertainties over volume and productivity narrow but are supplanted by new uncertainties such as sweep efficiency, fine scale architecture and changing responses to new production mechanisms and techniques.

These new issues demand a change in approach for the quantification of uncertainty. Vigilance is required to avoid the subsurface interpretation simply collapsing on to a best guess.

In my career as subsurface professional, I have experienced that often effective risk and uncertainty management can be built on three main aspects: tools, people, and team approach.


As engineers we are often most comfortable when we are using a piece of software as a tool to try to express reservoir uncertainty and evaluate the associated risks of development. While the software tools are increasingly sophisticated and strive for integration between geoscience and engineering, they represent only part of effective risk management.


We use a collection of subsurface disciplines to perform reservoir evaluation. We are subject to human biases, for example wanting to establish a bases case (known as “anchoring”) and being influenced by readily accessible data (known as “availability”). Such biases, or heuristics, can lead us to quick, but often misleading, conclusions.

Recognising these biases in others, and in ourselves, can help us to compensate for nature and make better evaluations of uncertainty and more reasoned investment decisions.


We are all familiar with the GANTT approach to project planning; it was introduced more than 100 years ago. The linear process is not always fast enough to produce the timely results we need, and uncertainties are often investigated at the end of study build by running sensitivities to a base case.

An alternative approach is to work our disciplines in parallel, consider key uncertainties throughout the evaluation, and set specific times to convene the team to plan the next phase of the reservoir study.

We call this the Forth Rail Bridge model.

To sum it up, we make better decisions when we:

  • elect the appropriate tools
  • recognise the influence of human bias
  • consider only key uncertainties rather than every possible combination
  • provide cycles of thinking time

to evaluate uncertainty and risk before planning the next stage of study."

The full article can be read here.

New service from OilVoice
Trip Shepherd is for companies who need to track their staff in areas of risk.
It's free to use, so we invite you to try it.

Visit source site


DecommissioningDecom North Seamature fieldRiskuncertaintyMasterclassAGR

More items from mariadjomina

AGR Commence Decommissioning Operations Offshore Ireland

AGR has begun the decommissioning operations of Ireland's first indigenous gas wells on behalf of PSE Kinsale Energy.  PSE Kinsale Energy Ltd, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRONAS, is decommissioning its gas fields in the Kinsale Area in the Celtic Sea, approximately 50 km off the south coast of ...

Maria Djomina - AGR

Posted 16 days agoPress > PSE Kinsale EnergyCeltic SeaAGR +7

AGR awarded Frame Agreement with Vår Energi

STAVANGER – October 28, 2020 AGR announced today that it has secured a frame agreement with Vår Energi AS to supply temporary contract workers across their extensive operations on the Norwegian Continental Shelf.  The Agreement covers supply of Offshore, Subsurface, Drilling & Wells, I ...

Maria Djomina - AGR

Posted 1 month agoPress > staffingandrecruitmentStaffingAGR +11

AGR Scores “Excellent” in Achilles FPAL Compliance Audit

AGR's Well Management business unit in the UK is celebrating its highest ever score in the FPAL Verify system operated by Achilles, achieving a rating of ‘excellent' in nearly all areas.  The results of the FPAL Verify audit, which examined the Health, Safety & Environment, Quality, Competence & T ...

Maria Djomina - AGR

Posted 4 months agoPress > AGRFPALAchilles +6

iQx™ Automates End of Well Reporting

The Software business unit of AGR has delivered the first automated End of Well Report for Lundin Energy Norway. The firm's industry-leading plug-and-play solution, iQx™ , was utilised to generate the detailed well completion report for a well drilled in the Edvard Grieg area by the Leiv Eiri ...

Maria Djomina - AGR

Posted 5 months agoPress > iQxAGR SoftwareAGR +7

AGR to deliver Well Management support to Emperor Energy during upcoming Exploration Campaign

AGR , the independent global provider of Well Management, well delivery software and Reservoir Management consultancy, is set to deliver planning and design of the Judith 2 Exploration Well to the ASX-listed Emperor Energy Limited (EMP). The Well is planned for the Judith Gas Field in VIC/P47 Perm ...

Maria Djomina - AGR

Posted 5 months agoPress > AGRAGR SoftwareAustralia +5
All posts from mariadjomina