Opinion

Well Abandonment - Accurate Costing


Below, AGR's Senior Technical Consultant discusses how probabilistic planning can solve key abandonment challenges.

In recent years there has been an increased focus on the field decommissioning and well abandonment with the associated costs for carrying out the operation. There seems to be a very wide variation in the estimated costs of the operations, especially in the area of well plug and abandonment.

Given the high cost of the whole process and the very large component that may be apportioned to well plugging and abandoning, as described in the Oil & Gas UK "Decommissioning Insight 2016", where the estimated cost for Well P&A for all UKCS Projects is 47% of total cost and for Subsea 69%, having a robust process for estimating Well P&A costs would be of major benefit to industry.

This suggests that there is room for a system that:

  • Standardises the process
  • Identifies Risks and the associated time and cost
  • Has detailed cost of services and equipment
  • Captures all the information in one place to avoid the “Excel Challenge”
  • Communicates the programme and the risks associated
  • Communicates the potential cost exposure to senior management.
AGR's P1™ software meets all of these requirements when planning the abandonment campaign. P1™ is designed for drilling operations and is ideal for the specialised area of well P&A.

The software allows the complete breakdown of the process into phases and each phase is then broken down into separate events. This is not dissimilar to how the normal planning would be carried out. The major difference is the identification and capture of risks and their impact on the project.

The software has a built in flow charting capability that makes communication of each event and the associated risk very simple. The example below is for a well P&A where there is limited information on the integrity of the cement in a casing section and the possible paths that will be followed by once this is defined by running a Cement Bond Log (CBL). The software captures the possible consequences of the poor CBL, it also captures all the steps required for the each option, both time and associated costs. 

The flow chart is ideal for communicating what the risks are in each phase of an operation and for prompting additional questions about the operation.

This lends itself to what can become a formalised process where a set of standard questions prompt responses that pull together all the information that is required for entry into the programme:
  • “How” will the operation be carried out
  • “What” equipment will be needed
  • “Who” Will need to be on site to do the work
  • “When” will the equipment and personnel be required
  • “Where” the equipment and personnel should be based
  • “Why” are we doing it this way, is there a better option?
Because P1™ runs a Monte Carlo Analysis it produces a range of time and cost similar to the graph shown below. The most important part of the graph is the potential risk exposure if all of the identified risks should occur.

As mentioned earlier all of the information is kept on one place and may be exported into an Excel format for inclusion in reports if required.

Cost Information - This can be very detailed and if required can show a possible distribution of costs, for example rig rates. It also details what phases of the operation costs are assigned to.

Currency Information - Exchange rates for different currencies

Phases - High level breakdown of the project

Events - Step by step breakdown, usually times are given as a distribution

Project Risk Information - These are risks such as weather, equipment failure.

Often abandonments are carried out as campaigns. There is an additional advantage to the software that allows multiple wells to be combined into a campaign for the final analysis.

Using P1™ software enables greater accuracy with justifications and assumptions captured so that as teams change out over time the understanding of decision process are still available and the project does not need to start over again.

For more details about the P1™ software, click here.

For other AGR software products, click here.



New service from OilVoice
Trip Shepherd is for companies who need to track their staff in areas of risk.
It's free to use, so we invite you to try it.

Visit source site

https://agr.com/blog/well-abandonment-accurate-cos...

petroleum softwareAGR Softwarewell abandonmentwell dataplugging and abandonmentsubsea abandonmentDecommissioningE&P Software

More items from mariadjomina


MOL Norge Selects AGR for Well and Drilling Engineering

AGR has been awarded a Frame Agreement with the Hungarian Operator MOL. The agreement covers the supply of technical support within drilling and well engineering to the Operator's Norwegian arm. The award adds to the ongoing collaboration the two companies have been enjoying in the recent years. ...

Maria Djomina - AGR


Posted 1 year agoPress > AGRwell managementreservoir modeling +5

Digital Knowledge Management leads to Cost-Effective Field Development

Stimulating the engineering teams to make “lessons-learned” recording an automated and standardised process? Huge amounts of data are being created and captured throughout the asset life. While there has been an exceptional evolution in developing software technologies for digitalising and stan ...

Maria Djomina - AGR


Posted 1 year agoOpinion > E&P SoftwareOil softwarepetroleum software +6

Real Time Data for Well Design Optimisation, Not Just Drilling Optimisation

AGR Software participated in SPE Intelligent Energy presenting a paper that focussed on using available and recorded data for improving well design, resulting in improved operational performance of new projects. SPE Intelligent Energy (IE) aims to bring together the global E&P industry to discu ...

Maria Djomina - AGR


Posted 1 year agoPress > E&P Softwarepetroleum softwareOil software +8

Deterministic vs Probabilistic Planning Method

The ability to show the management that the calculated well costs are based on realistic operations and prices for services is important as this allows them to see that the risks have also been identified and quantified. Clearer overview of costs' division gives a higher level of confidence for t ...

Maria Djomina - AGR


Posted 1 year agoPress > AGR SoftwareE&P SoftwareOil software +6

Future Directions in Reservoir Modelling

New tools and ‘fit-for-purpose' workflows. At the Petroleum Geology of North-West Europe conference , AGR's TRACS Training Director, Mark Bentley, together with the co-author of the book "Reservoir Model Design", Phil Ringrose of Statoil, presented a paper. The conference was arranged by the Ge ...

Maria Djomina - AGR


Posted 1 year agoOpinion > reservoir modelingreservoir analysis solutionsReservoir +6
All posts from mariadjomina